Terraform Patterns
Terraform infrastructure-as-code agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Covers module design patterns, state management strategies, provider configuration, security hardening, policy-as-code with Sentinel/OPA, and CI/CD plan/apply workflows. Use when: user wants to design Terraform modules, manage state backends, review Terraform security, implement multi-region deployments, or follow IaC best practices.
$ npx promptcreek add terraform-patternsAuto-detects your installed agents and installs the skill to each one.
What This Skill Does
This skill helps users write well-structured, secure, and production-grade Terraform code. It provides guidance on module design, state management, security hardening, and CI/CD integration. It's designed for those who want to avoid common Terraform pitfalls and create maintainable infrastructure.
When to Use
- Review Terraform code for anti-patterns.
- Design or refactor a Terraform module.
- Audit Terraform code for security vulnerabilities.
- Set up remote state backend.
- Implement multi-region Terraform deployment.
- Establish a Terraform CI/CD pipeline.
Key Features
Installation
$ npx promptcreek add terraform-patternsAuto-detects your installed agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, etc.) and installs the skill to each one.
View Full Skill Content
Terraform Patterns
> Predictable infrastructure. Secure state. Modules that compose. No drift.
Opinionated Terraform workflow that turns sprawling HCL into well-structured, secure, production-grade infrastructure code. Covers module design, state management, provider patterns, security hardening, and CI/CD integration.
Not a Terraform tutorial — a set of concrete decisions about how to write infrastructure code that doesn't break at 3 AM.
Slash Commands
| Command | What it does |
|---------|-------------|
| /terraform:review | Analyze Terraform code for anti-patterns, security issues, and structure problems |
| /terraform:module | Design or refactor a Terraform module with proper inputs, outputs, and composition |
| /terraform:security | Audit Terraform code for security vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and IAM misconfigurations |
When This Skill Activates
Recognize these patterns from the user:
- "Review this Terraform code"
- "Design a Terraform module for..."
- "My Terraform state is..."
- "Set up remote state backend"
- "Multi-region Terraform deployment"
- "Terraform security review"
- "Module structure best practices"
- "Terraform CI/CD pipeline"
- Any request involving:
.tffiles, HCL, Terraform modules, state management, provider configuration, infrastructure-as-code
If the user has .tf files or wants to provision infrastructure with Terraform → this skill applies.
Workflow
/terraform:review — Terraform Code Review
- Analyze current state
- Read all .tf files in the target directory
- Identify module structure (flat vs nested)
- Count resources, data sources, variables, outputs
- Check naming conventions
- Apply review checklist
MODULE STRUCTURE
├── Variables have descriptions and type constraints
├── Outputs expose only what consumers need
├── Resources use consistent naming: {provider}_{type}_{purpose}
├── Locals used for computed values and DRY expressions
└── No hardcoded values — everything parameterized or in locals
STATE & BACKEND
├── Remote backend configured (S3, GCS, Azure Blob, Terraform Cloud)
├── State locking enabled (DynamoDB for S3, native for others)
├── State encryption at rest enabled
├── No secrets stored in state (or state access is restricted)
└── Workspaces or directory isolation for environments
PROVIDERS
├── Version constraints use pessimistic operator: ~> 5.0
├── Required providers block in terraform {} block
├── Provider aliases for multi-region or multi-account
└── No provider configuration in child modules
SECURITY
├── No hardcoded secrets, keys, or passwords
├── IAM follows least-privilege principle
├── Encryption enabled for storage, databases, secrets
├── Security groups are not overly permissive (no 0.0.0.0/0 ingress on sensitive ports)
└── Sensitive variables marked with sensitive = true
- Generate report
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform
- Run security scan
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform
/terraform:module — Module Design
- Identify module scope
- Single responsibility: one module = one logical grouping
- Determine inputs (variables), outputs, and resource boundaries
- Decide: flat module (single directory) vs nested (calling child modules)
- Apply module design checklist
STRUCTURE
├── main.tf — Primary resources
├── variables.tf — All input variables with descriptions and types
├── outputs.tf — All outputs with descriptions
├── versions.tf — terraform {} block with required_providers
├── locals.tf — Computed values and naming conventions
├── data.tf — Data sources (if any)
└── README.md — Usage examples and variable documentation
VARIABLES
├── Every variable has: description, type, validation (where applicable)
├── Sensitive values marked: sensitive = true
├── Defaults provided for optional settings
├── Use object types for related settings: variable "config" { type = object({...}) }
└── Validate with: validation { condition = ... }
OUTPUTS
├── Output IDs, ARNs, endpoints — things consumers need
├── Include description on every output
├── Mark sensitive outputs: sensitive = true
└── Don't output entire resources — only specific attributes
COMPOSITION
├── Root module calls child modules
├── Child modules never call other child modules
├── Pass values explicitly — no hidden data source lookups in child modules
├── Provider configuration only in root module
└── Use module "name" { source = "./modules/name" }
- Generate module scaffold
- Output file structure with boilerplate
- Include variable validation blocks
- Add lifecycle rules where appropriate
/terraform:security — Security Audit
- Code-level audit
| Check | Severity | Fix |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Hardcoded secrets in .tf files | Critical | Use variables with sensitive = true or vault |
| IAM policy with * actions | Critical | Scope to specific actions and resources |
| Security group with 0.0.0.0/0 on port 22/3389 | Critical | Restrict to known CIDR blocks or use SSM/bastion |
| S3 bucket without encryption | High | Add server_side_encryption_configuration block |
| S3 bucket with public access | High | Add aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block |
| RDS without encryption | High | Set storage_encrypted = true |
| RDS publicly accessible | High | Set publicly_accessible = false |
| CloudTrail not enabled | Medium | Add aws_cloudtrail resource |
| Missing prevent_destroy on stateful resources | Medium | Add lifecycle { prevent_destroy = true } |
| Variables without sensitive = true for secrets | Medium | Add sensitive = true to secret variables |
- State security audit
| Check | Severity | Fix |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Local state file | Critical | Migrate to remote backend with encryption |
| Remote state without encryption | High | Enable encryption on backend (SSE-S3, KMS) |
| No state locking | High | Enable DynamoDB for S3, native for TF Cloud |
| State accessible to all team members | Medium | Restrict via IAM policies or TF Cloud teams |
- Generate security report
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --output json
Tooling
scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py
CLI utility for analyzing Terraform directory structure and module quality.
Features:
- Resource and data source counting
- Variable and output analysis (missing descriptions, types, validation)
- Naming convention checks
- Module composition detection
- File structure validation
- JSON and text output
Usage:
# Analyze a Terraform directory
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform
JSON output
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./terraform --output json
Analyze a specific module
python3 scripts/tf_module_analyzer.py ./modules/vpc
scripts/tf_security_scanner.py
CLI utility for scanning .tf files for common security issues.
Features:
- Hardcoded secret detection (AWS keys, passwords, tokens)
- Overly permissive IAM policy detection
- Open security group detection (0.0.0.0/0 on sensitive ports)
- Missing encryption checks (S3, RDS, EBS)
- Public access detection (S3, RDS, EC2)
- Sensitive variable audit
- JSON and text output
Usage:
# Scan a Terraform directory
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform
JSON output
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --output json
Strict mode (elevate warnings)
python3 scripts/tf_security_scanner.py ./terraform --strict
Module Design Patterns
Pattern 1: Flat Module (Small/Medium Projects)
infrastructure/
├── main.tf # All resources
├── variables.tf # All inputs
├── outputs.tf # All outputs
├── versions.tf # Provider requirements
├── terraform.tfvars # Environment values (not committed)
└── backend.tf # Remote state configuration
Best for: Single application, < 20 resources, one team owns everything.
Pattern 2: Nested Modules (Medium/Large Projects)
infrastructure/
├── environments/
│ ├── dev/
│ │ ├── main.tf # Calls modules with dev params
│ │ ├── backend.tf # Dev state backend
│ │ └── terraform.tfvars
│ ├── staging/
│ │ └── ...
│ └── prod/
│ └── ...
├── modules/
│ ├── networking/
│ │ ├── main.tf
│ │ ├── variables.tf
│ │ └── outputs.tf
│ ├── compute/
│ │ └── ...
│ └── database/
│ └── ...
└── versions.tf
Best for: Multiple environments, shared infrastructure patterns, team collaboration.
Pattern 3: Mono-Repo with Terragrunt
infrastructure/
├── terragrunt.hcl # Root config
├── modules/ # Reusable modules
│ ├── vpc/
│ ├── eks/
│ └── rds/
├── dev/
│ ├── terragrunt.hcl # Dev overrides
│ ├── vpc/
│ │ └── terragrunt.hcl # Module invocation
│ └── eks/
│ └── terragrunt.hcl
└── prod/
├── terragrunt.hcl
└── ...
Best for: Large-scale, many environments, DRY configuration, team-level isolation.
Provider Configuration Patterns
Version Pinning
terraform {
required_version = ">= 1.5.0"
required_providers {
aws = {
source = "hashicorp/aws"
version = "~> 5.0" # Allow 5.x, block 6.0
}
random = {
source = "hashicorp/random"
version = "~> 3.5"
}
}
}
Multi-Region with Aliases
provider "aws" {
region = "us-east-1"
}
provider "aws" {
alias = "west"
region = "us-west-2"
}
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "primary" {
bucket = "my-app-primary"
}
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "replica" {
provider = aws.west
bucket = "my-app-replica"
}
Multi-Account with Assume Role
provider "aws" {
alias = "production"
region = "us-east-1"
assume_role {
role_arn = "arn:aws:iam::PROD_ACCOUNT_ID:role/TerraformRole"
}
}
State Management Decision Tree
Single developer, small project?
├── Yes → Local state (but migrate to remote ASAP)
└── No
├── Using Terraform Cloud/Enterprise?
│ └── Yes → TF Cloud native backend (built-in locking, encryption, RBAC)
└── No
├── AWS?
│ └── S3 + DynamoDB (encryption, locking, versioning)
├── GCP?
│ └── GCS bucket (native locking, encryption)
├── Azure?
│ └── Azure Blob Storage (native locking, encryption)
└── Other?
└── Consul or PostgreSQL backend
Environment isolation strategy:
├── Separate state files per environment (recommended)
│ ├── Option A: Separate directories (dev/, staging/, prod/)
│ └── Option B: Terraform workspaces (simpler but less isolation)
└── Single state file for all environments (never do this)
CI/CD Integration Patterns
GitHub Actions Plan/Apply
# .github/workflows/terraform.yml
name: Terraform
on:
pull_request:
paths: ['terraform/**']
push:
branches: [main]
paths: ['terraform/**']
jobs:
plan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v3
- run: terraform init
- run: terraform validate
- run: terraform plan -out=tfplan
- run: terraform show -json tfplan > plan.json
# Post plan as PR comment
apply:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' && github.event_name == 'push'
environment: production
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v3
- run: terraform init
- run: terraform apply -auto-approve
Drift Detection
# Run on schedule to detect drift
name: Drift Detection
on:
schedule:
- cron: '0 6 1-5' # Weekdays at 6 AM
jobs:
detect:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v3
- run: terraform init
- run: |
terraform plan -detailed-exitcode -out=drift.tfplan 2>&1 | tee drift.log
EXIT_CODE=$?
if [ $EXIT_CODE -eq 2 ]; then
echo "DRIFT DETECTED — review drift.log"
# Send alert (Slack, PagerDuty, etc.)
fi
Proactive Triggers
Flag these without being asked:
- No remote backend configured → Migrate to S3/GCS/Azure Blob with locking and encryption.
- Provider without version constraint → Add
version = "~> X.0"to prevent breaking upgrades. - Hardcoded secrets in .tf files → Use variables with
sensitive = true, or integrate Vault/SSM. - IAM policy with
"Action": "*"→ Scope to specific actions. No wildcard actions in production. - Security group open to 0.0.0.0/0 on SSH/RDP → Restrict to bastion CIDR or use SSM Session Manager.
- No state locking → Enable DynamoDB table for S3 backend, or use TF Cloud.
- Resources without tags → Add default_tags in provider block. Tags are mandatory for cost tracking.
- Missing
prevent_destroyon databases/storage → Add lifecycle block to prevent accidental deletion.
Installation
One-liner (any tool)
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git
cp -r claude-skills/engineering/terraform-patterns ~/.claude/skills/
Multi-tool install
./scripts/convert.sh --skill terraform-patterns --tool codex|gemini|cursor|windsurf|openclaw
OpenClaw
clawhub install terraform-patterns
Related Skills
- senior-devops — Broader DevOps scope (CI/CD, monitoring, containerization). Complementary — use terraform-patterns for IaC-specific work, senior-devops for pipeline and infrastructure operations.
- aws-solution-architect — AWS architecture design. Complementary — terraform-patterns implements the infrastructure, aws-solution-architect designs it.
- senior-security — Application security. Complementary — terraform-patterns covers infrastructure security posture, senior-security covers application-level threats.
- ci-cd-pipeline-builder — Pipeline construction. Complementary — terraform-patterns defines infrastructure, ci-cd-pipeline-builder automates deployment.
Supported Agents
Attribution
Details
- Version
- 1.0.0
- License
- MIT
- Source
- seeded
- Published
- 3/17/2026
Tags
Related Skills
Agent Protocol
Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
CTO Advisor
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.
Agent Workflow Designer
Agent Workflow Designer