TDD Guide
Test-driven development skill for writing unit tests, generating test fixtures and mocks, analyzing coverage gaps, and guiding red-green-refactor workflows across Jest, Pytest, JUnit, Vitest, and Mocha. Use when the user asks to write tests, improve test coverage, practice TDD, generate mocks or stubs, or mentions testing frameworks like Jest, pytest, or JUnit. Handles test generation from source code, coverage report parsing (LCOV/JSON/XML), quality scoring, and framework conversion for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, and Java projects.
$ npx promptcreek add tdd-guideAuto-detects your installed agents and installs the skill to each one.
What This Skill Does
The TDD Guide assists developers in adopting test-driven development practices across various frameworks. It generates tests, analyzes coverage, and guides red-green-refactor workflows. This skill is useful for improving code quality and ensuring comprehensive test coverage.
When to Use
- Generate tests from existing code
- Analyze coverage gaps in test suites
- Implement a new feature using TDD
- Validate code changes with automated tests
- Refactor code while maintaining test coverage
- Ensure code meets coverage thresholds
Key Features
Installation
$ npx promptcreek add tdd-guideAuto-detects your installed agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, etc.) and installs the skill to each one.
View Full Skill Content
TDD Guide
Test-driven development skill for generating tests, analyzing coverage, and guiding red-green-refactor workflows across Jest, Pytest, JUnit, and Vitest.
Workflows
Generate Tests from Code
- Provide source code (TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java)
- Specify target framework (Jest, Pytest, JUnit, Vitest)
- Run
test_generator.pywith requirements - Review generated test stubs
- Validation: Tests compile and cover happy path, error cases, edge cases
Analyze Coverage Gaps
- Generate coverage report from test runner (
npm test -- --coverage) - Run
coverage_analyzer.pyon LCOV/JSON/XML report - Review prioritized gaps (P0/P1/P2)
- Generate missing tests for uncovered paths
- Validation: Coverage meets target threshold (typically 80%+)
TDD New Feature
- Write failing test first (RED)
- Run
tdd_workflow.py --phase redto validate - Implement minimal code to pass (GREEN)
- Run
tdd_workflow.py --phase greento validate - Refactor while keeping tests green (REFACTOR)
- Validation: All tests pass after each cycle
Examples
Test Generation — Input → Output (Pytest)
Input source function (math_utils.py):
def divide(a: float, b: float) -> float:
if b == 0:
raise ValueError("Cannot divide by zero")
return a / b
Command:
python scripts/test_generator.py --input math_utils.py --framework pytest
Generated test output (test_math_utils.py):
import pytest
from math_utils import divide
class TestDivide:
def test_divide_positive_numbers(self):
assert divide(10, 2) == 5.0
def test_divide_negative_numerator(self):
assert divide(-10, 2) == -5.0
def test_divide_float_result(self):
assert divide(1, 3) == pytest.approx(0.333, rel=1e-3)
def test_divide_by_zero_raises_value_error(self):
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Cannot divide by zero"):
divide(10, 0)
def test_divide_zero_numerator(self):
assert divide(0, 5) == 0.0
Coverage Analysis — Sample P0/P1/P2 Output
Command:
python scripts/coverage_analyzer.py --report lcov.info --threshold 80
Sample output:
Coverage Report — Overall: 63% (threshold: 80%)
P0 — Critical gaps (uncovered error paths):
auth/login.py:42-58 handle_expired_token() 0% covered
payments/process.py:91-110 handle_payment_failure() 0% covered
P1 — High-value gaps (core logic branches):
users/service.py:77 update_profile() — else branch 0% covered
orders/cart.py:134 apply_discount() — zero-qty guard 0% covered
P2 — Low-risk gaps (utility / helper functions):
utils/formatting.py:12 format_currency() 0% covered
Recommended: Generate tests for P0 items first to reach 80% threshold.
Key Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
|------|---------|-------|
| test_generator.py | Generate test cases from code/requirements | python scripts/test_generator.py --input source.py --framework pytest |
| coverage_analyzer.py | Parse and analyze coverage reports | python scripts/coverage_analyzer.py --report lcov.info --threshold 80 |
| tdd_workflow.py | Guide red-green-refactor cycles | python scripts/tdd_workflow.py --phase red --test test_auth.py |
| fixture_generator.py | Generate test data and mocks | python scripts/fixture_generator.py --entity User --count 5 |
Additional scripts: framework_adapter.py (convert between frameworks), metrics_calculator.py (quality metrics), format_detector.py (detect language/framework), output_formatter.py (CLI/desktop/CI output).
Input Requirements
For Test Generation:
- Source code (file path or pasted content)
- Target framework (Jest, Pytest, JUnit, Vitest)
- Coverage scope (unit, integration, edge cases)
For Coverage Analysis:
- Coverage report file (LCOV, JSON, or XML format)
- Optional: Source code for context
- Optional: Target threshold percentage
For TDD Workflow:
- Feature requirements or user story
- Current phase (RED, GREEN, REFACTOR)
- Test code and implementation status
Limitations
| Scope | Details |
|-------|---------|
| Unit test focus | Integration and E2E tests require different patterns |
| Static analysis | Cannot execute tests or measure runtime behavior |
| Language support | Best for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java |
| Report formats | LCOV, JSON, XML only; other formats need conversion |
| Generated tests | Provide scaffolding; require human review for complex logic |
When to use other tools:
- E2E testing: Playwright, Cypress, Selenium
- Performance testing: k6, JMeter, Locust
- Security testing: OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite
Supported Agents
Attribution
Details
- License
- MIT
- Source
- seeded
- Published
- 3/17/2026
Tags
Related Skills
Agent Protocol
Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.
CTO Advisor
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.
Agent Workflow Designer
Agent Workflow Designer